RE: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
> The tags allocation is limited by the fair sharing algorithm. It hurts
> the performance for UFS devices, because the queue depth of general I/O
> is reduced by half once the UFS send a control command.
Ack.

However, I think the decision of that should be of the platform owner,
And not in the core driver.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 17d7bb875fee..e96a50265285 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -5149,6 +5149,9 @@ static int ufshcd_slave_configure(struct scsi_device
> *sdev)
>         blk_queue_update_dma_pad(q, PRDT_DATA_BYTE_COUNT_PAD - 1);
>         if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_4KB_DMA_ALIGNMENT)
>                 blk_queue_update_dma_alignment(q, 4096 - 1);
> +
> +       blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_FAIR_TAG_SHARING, q);
> +
>         /*
>          * Block runtime-pm until all consumers are added.
>          * Refer ufshcd_setup_links().
> --
> 2.18.0





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux