On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 05:59:54AM +0000, Nilesh Javali wrote: > Christoph, > > Thanks for pointing to the commit. > I do not see this commit in Martin's tree 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches. > > Martin, > > The 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches are still at 6.2.0-rc1. > That could be the reason we hit the NVMe discovery NULL pointer dereference issue. > Any plans to pull the below commit to 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches. > Or am I missing something here. Hello Nilesh, What you are missing is that NVMe is not SCSI :) Consult the MAINTAINER file to see the correct (git) tree to climb: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS?h=v6.2#n14922 While SCSI sends pull requests straight to Linus, NVMe sends pull requests first to Jens, who then sends it to Linus. Kind regards, Niklas > > Thanks, > Nilesh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 11:05 PM > > To: Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-Storage- > > Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Bikash Hazarika <bhazarika@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Anil > > Gurumurthy <agurumurthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Shreyas Deodhar > > <sdeodhar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-fc: initialize nvme fc ctrl ops > > > > External Email > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:57:08AM -0800, Nilesh Javali wrote: > > > CPU: 61 PID: 6064 Comm: nvme Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1 #3 > > > > Well, that's a reall old -rc. > > > > This should be fixed by: > > > > commit 98e3528012cd571c48bbae7c7c0f868823254b6c > > Author: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri Jan 20 17:43:54 2023 +0000 > > > > nvme-fc: fix initialization order >
