RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-fc: initialize nvme fc ctrl ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

Thanks for pointing to the commit.
I do not see this commit in Martin's tree 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches.

Martin,

The 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches are still at 6.2.0-rc1.
That could be the reason we hit the NVMe discovery NULL pointer dereference issue.
Any plans to pull the below commit to 6.3/scsi-staging or 6.3/scsi-queue branches.
Or am I missing something here.

Thanks,
Nilesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 11:05 PM
> To: Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-Storage-
> Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Bikash Hazarika <bhazarika@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Anil
> Gurumurthy <agurumurthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Shreyas Deodhar
> <sdeodhar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-fc: initialize nvme fc ctrl ops
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:57:08AM -0800, Nilesh Javali wrote:
> > CPU: 61 PID: 6064 Comm: nvme Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.2.0-rc1 #3
> 
> Well, that's a reall old -rc.
> 
> This should be fixed by:
> 
> commit 98e3528012cd571c48bbae7c7c0f868823254b6c
> Author: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Jan 20 17:43:54 2023 +0000
> 
>     nvme-fc: fix initialization order




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux