Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

>> We can ask our suppliers politely to not claim FUA support in future
>> devices. However we still need patch 1/2 for existing UFS devices.
>
> Please add quirks for the actually affected devices, and do not
> block fua for an entire transport.

Yeah, I agree. Let's not make assumptions about implementation
deficiencies based on transport. If there are specific devices that
perform better with SYNCHRONIZE CACHE, then we should quirk them.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux