Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices
From
: Bean Huo <huobean@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:34:48 +0100
Cc
: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20230202220041.560919-1-bvanassche@acm.org
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Hi Bart, To this series patch: Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Bean
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
[PATCH v2 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices
From:
Bart Van Assche
Prev by Date:
[PATCH 19/23] swap: use bvec_set_page to initialize bvecs
Next by Date:
Re: [RESEND] target: add virtual remote target
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices
Next by thread:
[PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix kernel-doc syntax
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]
