RE: [PATCH v2] cxgbi: cxgb4i: Added pointer check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Return value of a function 'alloc_wr' is dereferenced at cxgb4i.c:624
>> without checking for null, but it is usually checked for this function
>> 
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
>> index 2c3491528d42..b93bd36dcb2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c
>> @@ -620,6 +620,8 @@ static inline int send_tx_flowc_wr(struct cxgbi_sock *csk)
>>  #endif
>>  	flowclen16 = tx_flowc_wr_credits(&nparams, &flowclen);
>>  	skb = alloc_wr(flowclen, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +	if (!skb)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>
>If this returns a negative value push_tx_frames is going to mishandle it.
>I'm not sure how to best handle the failure there, but I cc'd the correct
>maintainer, Varun.

push_tx_frames() can not handle negative return value from send_tx_flowc_wr(),
to fix this issue we can preallocate a skb in alloc_cpls() and use this skb in send_tx_flowc_wr().




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux