> On 11/15/22 00:56, Avri Altman wrote: > > It is usually acceptable to temporarily use quirks while the hw get fixed. > > The behavior supported by this patch is not a hardware bug - my understanding > is that it is behavior that has been chosen on purpose by the Exynos design > team. > > I can convert this patch such that it uses a "quirk" flag instead of a kernel config > option to enable support for Exynos encryption. However, doing that will add > runtime overhead in the hot path for all UFS vendors, including those that are > compliant with the UFSHCI specification. Is everyone OK with this? No - I guess not. Thanks, Avri > > Thanks, > > Bart.
