Re: [patch 0/4] aha152x.c - Cleanup, need help in testing and auditing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I prefer either of the !HIGHMEM or slave_alloc changes to adding
> a BUG_ON().  However, the SCSI people likely won't want to use the
> slave_alloc() change because then the driver may never get fixed.
> (Of course, it hasn't got fixed with the BUG happening either.)
> 
> Anyway, I'll re-read Documentation/DMA*.txt to see if I can fix it.
> 
> ---

Hi Randy.

could you please send me the patch you have with the .slave_alloc
solution for now. I would like to revise the patchset and send them
for inclusion now. They do fix some problems and let users work.
We can put a big fat warring and explanation about highmem in the
commit log comments so people can watch out.

Thanks
Boaz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux