Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] scsi: ufs: Introduce the function ufshcd_execute_start_stop()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/22 12:57, Mike Christie wrote:
On 10/18/22 3:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Open-code scsi_execute() because a later patch will modify scmd->flags
and because scsi_execute() does not support setting scmd->flags. No
functionality is changed.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 2a32bcc93d2e..c5ccc7ba583b 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -8729,6 +8729,39 @@ static void ufshcd_hba_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  	}
  }
+static int ufshcd_execute_start_stop(struct scsi_device *sdev,
+				     enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode pwr_mode,
+				     struct scsi_sense_hdr *sshdr)
+{
+	unsigned char cdb[6] = { START_STOP, 0, 0, 0, pwr_mode << 4, 0 };
+	struct request *req;
+	struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
+	int ret;
+
+	req = scsi_alloc_request(sdev->request_queue, REQ_OP_DRV_IN,
+				 BLK_MQ_REQ_PM);


Can you hit a case where we have run out of tags (__blk_mq_alloc_requests
is hitting the blk_mq_get_tag == BLK_MQ_NO_TAG check), the host has gone
into recovery and so commands are completing to add a tag back and then we
try to call this and get stuck waiting on a tag? Or for passthrough do we
have some special reserve?

If so do you need to use BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT here? Maybe do the retry loop
yourself like:

retry:
	if host is in recovery
		return failure

	req = scsi_alloc_request(.... BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)
	if (!req and we have not hit some retry limit)
		goto retry


or have some special reserve command/tag.

Hi Mike,

No other SCSI commands should be in progress when ufshcd_execute_start_stop() is called because that function is only called during system suspend and resume and no other I/O should be in progress at that time. Additionally, there is a mutual exclusion mechanism in the UFS driver to serialize system suspend/resume activity and error handling.

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux