On 10/19/22 12:50, Asutosh Das wrote:
While adding the vops it occurred to me that it'd remain empty because
ufs-qcom
doesn't need it. And I'm not sure how MTK register space is laid out.
So please can you help add a vops in the next version?
I can address the other comment and push the series.
Please do not introduce new vops without adding at least one
implementation of the vop in the same patch series. How about letting
MediaTek add more vops as necessary in a separate patch series and
focusing in this patch series on UFSHCI 4.0 compliance?
Thanks,
Bart.
