Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix mpt3sas driver sparse warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/09/15 16:55, matoro wrote:
> Hi Damien, apologies for continuing to bother.  Did you get a chance to 
> put together a quick fix for this to test?

Not yet. Have been super busy with Plumbers & travel and other stuff. This is
still at the top of my to do list. Will try to send you something to test today.

> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix mpt3sas driver sparse warnings
> Date: 2022-08-22 13:53
>  From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> On 2022/08/22 10:51, matoro wrote:
>> Hi Damien, were you able to put together a fix to test?  We're up to
>> 5.19.3 now and 5.18 was just marked EOL, so I want to make sure this
>> doesn't drop off the radar.
> 
> No, sorry, I have been busy as I am traveling. Flying back home this 
> week, so
> likely will have more time next week.
> 
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix mpt3sas driver sparse warnings
>> Date: 2022-08-11 15:17
>>  From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On 2022/08/11 12:05, matoro wrote:
>>> Just a small update, the module stuff turned out to be a separate,
>>> unrelated regression.  I bisected that one also (applying these 
>>> reverts
>>> each time to allow me to boot) and reported it to Masahiro, who put in
>>> a
>>> fix for it here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220809141117.641543-1-masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>> .  So you can ignore that stuff.  Are these two commits still planned
>>> to
>>> be reverted?
>>
>> Revert should be a last resort (I really want to get rid of all these
>> sparse
>> warnings !). Let me first try to generate a fix for you to test.
>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix mpt3sas driver sparse warnings
>>> Date: 2022-08-02 19:36
>>>  From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Sreekanth Reddy
>>> <sreekanth.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> On 8/3/22 05:27, matoro wrote:
>>>> Hi folks, sorry for the lateness, unfortunately this is in fact 
>>>> broken
>>>> on BE.  I use mpt3sas on sparc and my drives fail to come up on 5.19,
>>>> bisected to this patchset.  Reverting both of the endian-related
>>>> commits, b4efbec4c2a75b619fae4e8768be379e88c78687 and
>>>> 7ab4d2441b952977556672c2fe3f4c2a698cbb37, allows it to boot.  
>>>> However,
>>>> after booting, I can't load any modules - everything errors with
>>>> "disagrees about version of symbol module_layout".  I have completely
>>>> wiped out kernel sources, the module tree, and the kernel image,
>>>> rebuilding both from scratch with ONLY the revert patch applied, but 
>>>> I
>>>> still can't load any modules.  Presumably it would work with
>>>> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=n, but these CRC checks are there for a reason and
>>>> I
>>>> can't tell if it has something to do with the revert or not.
>>>
>>> For b4efbec4c2a75b619fae4e8768be379e88c78687, removing the
>>> cpu_to_le32()
>>> call results in the bytes actually being reversed by writel()/readl()
>>> for
>>> your BE machine. So it looks like the values that need to be written 
>>> to
>>> the HBA have to be in CPU endian, not le32. Should be easy to fix.
>>> And for 7ab4d2441b952977556672c2fe3f4c2a698cbb37, this looks like the
>>> same
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> I will be traveling and busy this week, but I can have a look at a fix
>>> next Monday. If the Broadcom folks can send a fix faster than that,
>>> that
>>> is of course welcome :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ modprobe --dump-modversions
>>>> /lib/modules/5.19.0-gentoo-sparc64/kernel/fs/openpromfs/openpromfs.ko
>>>> |
>>>> grep "module_layout"
>>>> 0xa6c23707      module_layout
>>>> $ grep "module_layout" /usr/src/linux/Module.symvers
>>>> 0xa6c23707      module_layout   vmlinux EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>>>
>>>> If you need real hardware access and do not have any on hand, please
>>>> reach out and I can provide temporary access!
>>>>
>>>> Here is the full error on vanilla 5.19:
>>>>
>>>> mpt3sas version 42.100.00.00 loaded
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: 64 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED, total mem
>>>> (32650280 kB)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: _base_wait_for_doorbell_not_used: failed due to timeout
>>>> count(5000), doorbell_reg(18000000)!
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: CurrentHostPageSize is 0: Setting default host page size
>>>> to
>>>> 4k
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: MSI-X vectors supported: 1
>>>>           no of cores: 64, max_msix_vectors: -1
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0:  0 1 1
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: pci_alloc_irq_vectors failed (r=-22) !!!
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: High IOPs queues : disabled
>>>> mpt2sas0: IO-APIC enabled: IRQ 4
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: iomem(0x0000084100000000), mapped(0x(____ptrval____)),
>>>> size(16384)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: ioport(0x0000085100000000), size(256)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: doorbell is in use (line=6869)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: _base_get_ioc_facts: handshake failed (r=-14)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm0: failure at
>>>> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:12336/_scsih_probe()!
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: 64 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED, total mem
>>>> (32650280 kB)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: _base_wait_for_doorbell_not_used: failed due to timeout
>>>> count(5000), doorbell_reg(18000000)!
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: CurrentHostPageSize is 0: Setting default host page size
>>>> to
>>>> 4k
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: MSI-X vectors supported: 1
>>>>           no of cores: 64, max_msix_vectors: -1
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1:  0 1 1
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: pci_alloc_irq_vectors failed (r=-22) !!!
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: High IOPs queues : disabled
>>>> mpt2sas1: IO-APIC enabled: IRQ 5
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: iomem(0x0000084120000000), mapped(0x(____ptrval____)),
>>>> size(16384)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: ioport(0x0000085100002000), size(256)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: doorbell is in use (line=6869)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: _base_get_ioc_facts: handshake failed (r=-14)
>>>> mpt2sas_cm1: failure at
>>>> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:12336/_scsih_probe()!
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix mpt3sas driver sparse warnings
>>>> Date: 2022-03-09 01:35
>>>>  From: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:26 AM Martin K. Petersen
>>>> <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sreekanth,
>>>>>
>>>>>> This series fix (remove) all sparse warnings generated when
>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>> the mpt3sas driver. All warnings are related to __iomem access and
>>>>>> endianness.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review this series and validate the patch 5 modification.
>>>>
>>>> Martin,
>>>> This patch set looks good, but before acknowledging this patch set I
>>>> just wanted to do some basic testing on a big endian machine.
>>>> Currently I don't have a big endian machine, internally I am checking
>>>> to get access to big endian machines. Meanwhile if anyone does a 
>>>> basic
>>>> testing on any big endian machine then please let me know. I will add
>>>> the acknowledgement signature.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sreekanth
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Martin K. Petersen      Oracle Linux Engineering
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux