Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] scsi: qla2xxx: Drop DID_TARGET_FAILURE use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Aug 11, 2022, at 6:00 PM, Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> DID_TARGET_FAILURE is internal to the SCSI layer. Drivers must not use it
> because:
> 
> 1. It's not propagated upwards, so SG IO/passthrough users will not see an
> error and think a command was successful.
> 
> 2. There is no handling for them in scsi_decide_disposition so it results
> in the scsi eh running.
> 
> This has qla2xxx use DID_NO_CONNECT because it looks like we hit this
> error when we can't find a port. It will give us the same hard error
> behavior and it seems to match the error where we can't find the
> endpoint.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
> index 400a8b6f3982..00ccc41cef14 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
> @@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ qla24xx_sadb_update(struct bsg_job *bsg_job)
> 		ql_dbg(ql_dbg_edif, vha, 0x70a3, "Failed to find port= %06x\n",
> 		    sa_frame.port_id.b24);
> 		rval = -EINVAL;
> -		SET_DID_STATUS(bsg_reply->result, DID_TARGET_FAILURE);
> +		SET_DID_STATUS(bsg_reply->result, DID_NO_CONNECT);
> 		goto done;
> 	}
> 
> -- 
> 2.18.2
> 

FWIW. Looks Good.

Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Himanshu Madhani	Oracle Linux Engineering





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux