[PATCH v2 06/10] scsi: qla2xxx: Drop DID_TARGET_FAILURE use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



DID_TARGET_FAILURE is internal to the SCSI layer. Drivers must not use it
because:

1. It's not propagated upwards, so SG IO/passthrough users will not see an
error and think a command was successful.

2. There is no handling for them in scsi_decide_disposition so it results
in the scsi eh running.

This has qla2xxx use DID_NO_CONNECT because it looks like we hit this
error when we can't find a port. It will give us the same hard error
behavior and it seems to match the error where we can't find the
endpoint.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
index 400a8b6f3982..00ccc41cef14 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_edif.c
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ qla24xx_sadb_update(struct bsg_job *bsg_job)
 		ql_dbg(ql_dbg_edif, vha, 0x70a3, "Failed to find port= %06x\n",
 		    sa_frame.port_id.b24);
 		rval = -EINVAL;
-		SET_DID_STATUS(bsg_reply->result, DID_TARGET_FAILURE);
+		SET_DID_STATUS(bsg_reply->result, DID_NO_CONNECT);
 		goto done;
 	}
 
-- 
2.18.2




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux