Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/18] scsi: core: Implement reserved command handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/15/22 16:35, John Garry wrote:
On 15/06/2022 00:43, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 6/15/22 03:20, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 6/13/22 00:01, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 6/9/22 19:29, John Garry wrote:
+    /*
+     * This determines how many commands the HBA will set aside
+     * for internal commands. This number will be added to
+     * @can_queue to calcumate the maximum number of simultaneous

s/calcumate/calculate

But this is weird. For SATA, can_queue is 32. Having reserved commands,
that number needs to stay the same. We cannot have more than 32 tags.
I think keeping can_queue as the max queue depth with at most
nr_reserved_cmds tags reserved is better.

+     * commands sent to the host.
+     */
+    int nr_reserved_cmds;

+1 for Damien's request. I also prefer to keep can_queue as the maximum
queue depth, whether or not nr_reserved_cmds has been set.

For non SATA drives, I still think that is a good idea. However, for SATA,
we always have the internal tag command that is special. With John's
change, it would have to be reserved but that means we are down to 31 max
QD,

My intention is to keep regular tag depth at 32 for SATA. We add an extra tag as a reserved tag. Indeed, this is called a 'tag', but it's just really the placeholder for what will be the ATA_TAG_INTERNAL request.

About how we set scsi_host.can_queue, in this series we set .can_queue as max regular tags, and the handling is as follows:

scsi_mq_setup_tags():
tag_set->queue_depth = shost->can_queue + shost->nr_reserved_cmds
tag_set->reserved_tags = shost->nr_reserved_cmds

So we honour the rule that blk_mq_tag_set.queue_depth is the total tag depth, including reserved.

Incidentally I think Christoph prefers to keep .can_queue at total max tags including reserved: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/337339b7-6f4a-a25c-f11c-7f701b42d6a8@xxxxxxx/

so going backward several years... That internal tag for ATA does not
need to be reserved since this command is always used when the drive is
idle and no other NCQ commands are on-going.

So do you mean that ATA_TAG_INTERNAL qc is used for other commands apart from internal commands?

No. It is used only for internal commands. What I meant to say is that currently, internal commands are issued only on device scan, device revalidate and error handling. All of these phases are done with the device under EH with the issuing path stopped and all commands completed, so no regular commands can be issued. Only internal ones, non NCQ, using the ATA_TAG_INTERNAL. So strictly speaking, we should not need to reserve that internal tag at all.



So the solution to all this is a likely a little more complicated if we
want to keep ATA max QD to 32.


thanks,
John


--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux