On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 14:31 +0900, Keoseong Park wrote:
> > +/**
> > + *ufshpb_submit_region_inactive() - submit a region to be
> > inactivated later
> > + *@hpb: per-LU HPB instance
> > + *@region_index: the index associated with the region that will be
> > inactivated later
> > + */
> > +static void ufshpb_submit_region_inactive(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> > int region_index)
> > +{
> > + int subregion_index;
> > + struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
> > + struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Remove this region from active region list and add it
> > to inactive list
> > + */
> > + spin_lock(&hpb->rsp_list_lock);
> > + ufshpb_update_inactive_info(hpb, region_index);
> How about separating the "hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt++" code from
> ufshpb_update_inactive_info()?
> Because I think this code should only be used in
> ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update().
based on Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs:
"What: /sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/hpb_stats/rb_inactive_cnt
Date: June 2021
Contact: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Description: This entry shows the number of inactive regions
recommended by response UPIUs."
This parameter should be increased only when recieving inactive
recommended.
I will change it in the next version, thanks.
Kind regards,
Bean
