--- James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You're sort of confusing what we display as the LUN and what we > represent it as internally (admittedly they're the same at the moment). > The object would be to separate these and the debate is really about > what to display. Display this: "%016llx", ((unsigned long long) be64_to_cpu(*(__be64 *)(LUN))), where LUN is u8[8]. Notice the ugly, C-centric "0x" prefix is missing. Not sure who would confuse this number for decimal or octal base representation of a LUN... This also makes it great to be a directory name, since it is the same width and format, and it looks great in "tree" listing format, as shown in here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=112629509826900&w=2 Luben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
