Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: libsas: Use bool for queue_work() return code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-int sas_queue_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha, struct sas_work *sw)
+bool sas_queue_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha, struct sas_work *sw)
  {
  	/* it's added to the defer_q when draining so return succeed */
-	int rc = 1;
+	bool rc = true;
if (!test_bit(SAS_HA_REGISTERED, &ha->state))
-		return 0;
+		return false;
if (test_bit(SAS_HA_DRAINING, &ha->state)) {
  		/* add it to the defer list, if not already pending */
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ int sas_queue_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha, struct sas_work *sw)
  	return rc;

While at it, I would cleanup this function like this:

ok, fine


diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c
index 3613b9b315bc..38e6e91aaf36 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c
@@ -12,20 +12,17 @@

  int sas_queue_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha, struct sas_work *sw)
  {
-       /* it's added to the defer_q when draining so return succeed */
-       int rc = 1;
-
         if (!test_bit(SAS_HA_REGISTERED, &ha->state))
-               return 0;
+               return false;

         if (test_bit(SAS_HA_DRAINING, &ha->state)) {
                 /* add it to the defer list, if not already pending */
                 if (list_empty(&sw->drain_node))
                         list_add_tail(&sw->drain_node, &ha->defer_q);
-       } else
-               rc = queue_work(ha->event_q, &sw->work);
+               return true;
+       }

-       return rc;
+       return queue_work(ha->event_q, &sw->work);
  }

No local variable :)

  }
-static int sas_queue_event(int event, struct sas_work *work,
+static bool sas_queue_event(int event, struct sas_work *work,
  			    struct sas_ha_struct *ha)
  {
  	unsigned long flags;
-	int rc;
+	bool rc;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ha->lock, flags);
  	rc = sas_queue_work(ha, work);
@@ -44,13 +44,12 @@ static int sas_queue_event(int event, struct sas_work *work,
  void sas_queue_deferred_work(struct sas_ha_struct *ha)
  {
  	struct sas_work *sw, *_sw;
-	int ret;
spin_lock_irq(&ha->lock);
  	list_for_each_entry_safe(sw, _sw, &ha->defer_q, drain_node) {
  		list_del_init(&sw->drain_node);
-		ret = sas_queue_work(ha, sw);
-		if (ret != 1) {
+
+		if (sas_queue_work(ha, sw) == false) {

if (!sas_queue_work(ha, sw)) ?

ok, yeah, that's the pattern I see elsehwhere in the kernel


  			pm_runtime_put(ha->dev);
  			sas_free_event(to_asd_sas_event(&sw->work));
  		}
@@ -170,7 +169,6 @@ void sas_notify_port_event(struct asd_sas_phy *phy, enum port_event event,
  {
  	struct sas_ha_struct *ha = phy->ha;
  	struct asd_sas_event *ev;
-	int ret;
BUG_ON(event >= PORT_NUM_EVENTS); @@ -186,8 +184,7 @@ void sas_notify_port_event(struct asd_sas_phy *phy, enum port_event event,
  	if (sas_defer_event(phy, ev))
  		return;
- ret = sas_queue_event(event, &ev->work, ha);
-	if (ret != 1) {
+	if (sas_queue_event(event, &ev->work, ha) == false) {

Same.

  		pm_runtime_put(ha->dev);
  		sas_free_event(ev);
  	}
@@ -199,7 +196,6 @@ void sas_notify_phy_event(struct asd_sas_phy *phy, enum phy_event event,
  {
  	struct sas_ha_struct *ha = phy->ha;
  	struct asd_sas_event *ev;
-	int ret;
BUG_ON(event >= PHY_NUM_EVENTS); @@ -215,8 +211,7 @@ void sas_notify_phy_event(struct asd_sas_phy *phy, enum phy_event event,
  	if (sas_defer_event(phy, ev))
  		return;
- ret = sas_queue_event(event, &ev->work, ha);
-	if (ret != 1) {
+	if (sas_queue_event(event, &ev->work, ha) == false) {

And again.


ok, thanks



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux