Hi Jinpu,
> Hi Ajish,
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:15 PM Ajish Koshy <Ajish.Koshy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Error handling steps were not in sequence as per the programmers
> > manual. Expected sequence:
> > -PHY_DOWN (PORT_IN_RESET)
> > -PORT_RESET_TIMER_TMO
> > -Host aborts pending I/Os
> > -Host deregister the device
> > -Host sends HW_EVENT_PHY_DOWN ack
>
> Just to make sure, does the same sequence work for old pm8001 chip?
Currently this code is modified and executed based on 8006 controller.
I need to check with team members about the this sequence on old
controller pm8001 chip.
> >
> > Earlier, we were sending HW_EVENT_PHY_DOWN ack first and then
> > deregister the device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ajish Koshy <Ajish.Koshy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Viswas G <Viswas.G@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 7 ++++++-
> > drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 7 +++++--
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> > index c9a16eef38c1..160ee8b228c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
> > @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ int pm8001_abort_task(struct sas_task *task)
> > struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev;
> > struct pm8001_tmf_task tmf_task;
> > int rc = TMF_RESP_FUNC_FAILED, ret;
> > - u32 phy_id;
> > + u32 phy_id, port_id;
> > struct sas_task_slow slow_task;
> >
> > if (unlikely(!task || !task->lldd_task || !task->dev)) @@
> > -1246,6 +1246,7 @@ int pm8001_abort_task(struct sas_task *task)
> > DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(completion_reset);
> > DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(completion);
> > struct pm8001_phy *phy = pm8001_ha->phy +
> > phy_id;
> > + port_id = phy->port->port_id;
> >
> > /* 1. Set Device state as Recovery */
> > pm8001_dev->setds_completion = &completion; @@
> > -1297,6 +1298,10 @@ int pm8001_abort_task(struct sas_task *task)
> > PORT_RESET_TMO);
> > if (phy->port_reset_status == PORT_RESET_TMO) {
> > pm8001_dev_gone_notify(dev);
> > + PM8001_CHIP_DISP->hw_event_ack_req(
> > + pm8001_ha, 0,
> > + 0x07, /*HW_EVENT_PHY_DOWN ack*/
> > + port_id, phy_id, 0,
> > + 0);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> > b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> > index 83eec16d021d..a17da1cebce1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
> > @@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ struct pm8001_dispatch {
> > u32 state);
> > int (*sas_re_init_req)(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha);
> > int (*fatal_errors)(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha);
> > + void (*hw_event_ack_req)(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> > + u32 Qnum, u32 SEA, u32 port_id, u32 phyId, u32 param0,
> > + u32 param1);
> > };
> >
> > struct pm8001_chip_info {
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> > index 0849ecc913c7..97750d0ebee9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> > @@ -3709,8 +3709,10 @@ static int mpi_hw_event(struct
> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
> > break;
> > case HW_EVENT_PORT_RESET_TIMER_TMO:
> > pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, MSG,
> "HW_EVENT_PORT_RESET_TIMER_TMO\n");
> > - pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
> HW_EVENT_PHY_DOWN,
> > - port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
> > + if (!pm8001_ha->phy[phy_id].reset_completion) {
> > + pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req(pm8001_ha, 0,
> HW_EVENT_PHY_DOWN,
> > + port_id, phy_id, 0, 0);
> > + }
> > sas_phy_disconnected(sas_phy);
> > phy->phy_attached = 0;
> > sas_notify_port_event(sas_phy, PORTE_LINK_RESET_ERR,
> > @@ -5051,4 +5053,5 @@ const struct pm8001_dispatch
> pm8001_80xx_dispatch = {
> > .fw_flash_update_req = pm8001_chip_fw_flash_update_req,
> > .set_dev_state_req = pm8001_chip_set_dev_state_req,
> > .fatal_errors = pm80xx_fatal_errors,
> > + .hw_event_ack_req = pm80xx_hw_event_ack_req,
> > };
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
Thanks,
Ajish
