On 11/30/21 12:54 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
The concern of this patch is that it reduces the UFS data transmission queue depth. The cost is a bit high. We are looking for alternative methods: for example, to fix this problem from the SCSI layer; Add a new dedicated hardware device management queue on the UFS device side.
Are any performance numbers available? My performance measurements did not report a significant difference between the 31 and 32 queue depths. Thanks, Bart.
