Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bart,

The concern of this patch is that it reduces the UFS data transmission
queue depth. The cost is a bit high. We are looking for alternative
methods: for example, to fix this problem from the SCSI layer;
Add a new dedicated hardware device management queue on the UFS device
side.

Kind regards,
Bean

On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 11:57 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The following deadlock has been observed on a test setup:
> * All tags allocated.
> * The SCSI error handler calls ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()
> * ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() queues work that calls
> ufshcd_err_handler()
> * ufshcd_err_handler() locks up as follows:
> 
> Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler.cfi_jt
> Call trace:
>  __switch_to+0x298/0x5d8
>  __schedule+0x6cc/0xa94
>  schedule+0x12c/0x298
>  blk_mq_get_tag+0x210/0x480
>  __blk_mq_alloc_request+0x1c8/0x284
>  blk_get_request+0x74/0x134
>  ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x68/0x640
>  ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x68/0x35c
>  ufshcd_probe_hba+0x12c/0x1cb8
>  ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x88/0x254
>  ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0xd0/0x354
>  ufshcd_err_handler+0x408/0xc58
>  process_one_work+0x24c/0x66c
>  worker_thread+0x3e8/0xa4c
>  kthread+0x150/0x1b4
>  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
> 
> Fix this lockup by making ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() allocate a reserved
> request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index a241ef6bbc6f..03f4772fc2e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_dump_regs);
>  enum {
>  	UFSHCD_MAX_CHANNEL	= 0,
>  	UFSHCD_MAX_ID		= 1,
> -	UFSHCD_CMD_PER_LUN	= 32,
> -	UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE	= 32,
> +	UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED	= 1,
> +	UFSHCD_CMD_PER_LUN	= 32 - UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED,
> +	UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE	= 32 - UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED,
>  };
>  
>  static const char *const ufshcd_state_name[] = {
> @@ -2941,12 +2942,7 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba
> *hba,
>  
>  	down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Get free slot, sleep if slots are unavailable.
> -	 * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
> -	 * the maximum wait time is bounded by SCSI request timeout.
> -	 */
> -	scmd = scsi_get_internal_cmd(q, DMA_TO_DEVICE, 0);
> +	scmd = scsi_get_internal_cmd(q, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED);
>  	if (IS_ERR(scmd)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(scmd);
>  		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -8171,6 +8167,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template
> ufshcd_driver_template = {
>  	.sg_tablesize		= SG_ALL,
>  	.cmd_per_lun		= UFSHCD_CMD_PER_LUN,
>  	.can_queue		= UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE,
> +	.reserved_tags		= UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED,
>  	.max_segment_size	= PRDT_DATA_BYTE_COUNT_MAX,
>  	.max_host_blocked	= 1,
>  	.track_queue_depth	= 1,
> @@ -9531,8 +9528,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
>  	/* Configure LRB */
>  	ufshcd_host_memory_configure(hba);
>  
> -	host->can_queue = hba->nutrs;
> -	host->cmd_per_lun = hba->nutrs;
> +	host->can_queue = hba->nutrs - UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED;
> +	host->cmd_per_lun = hba->nutrs - UFSHCD_NUM_RESERVED;
>  	host->max_id = UFSHCD_MAX_ID;
>  	host->max_lun = UFS_MAX_LUNS;
>  	host->max_channel = UFSHCD_MAX_CHANNEL;




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux