Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens,

> But yes, reuse of the existing request is probably another potentially
> viable approach. My worry there is that inevitably you end up needing
> to stash a lot of data to restore the original, and we're certainly
> not adding anything to struct request for that.

Yeah, I much prefer the reserved tag approach. That was my original
recommendation.

SCSI error handling does command hijacking and it is absolutely
dreadful.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux