Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James,

> I was hoping the HPB guys would do this.

Yes, that would be great. Easier to validate for someone with access to
the hardware in question.

> Agreed, that was my initial proposed solution: get rid of the write
> buffer optimzation now to fix the API abuse and see if we can add it
> back in a more acceptable form later.

Doesn't matter to me whether we back out the 2.0 stuff or mark it as
broken. I merely objected to reverting all of HPB since I don't think
that would solve anything.

But obviously we'll need a patch to fix 5.15 ASAP...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux