On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 11:05 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/12/21 10:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 10:29 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > A meeting will be held later this month to talk about the > > > technical aspects of the UFS driver and also about how to evolve > > > the UFS driver further. Since using email to coordinate a date, > > > time and agenda is inconvenient, please use the following > > > document to reach agreement about the time of the meeting and > > > also about the agenda: > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pYONI__pbNcVVQqPA7iSbeQRyf0IQOuZlYR7Gnrikco/ > > > > That link is giving permission denied. You need to update the > > sharing settings to give you an access link for anyone to view. > > Hi James, > > That document has been created using my work account. Recently my > employer changed the settings for work documents such that even > read-only access has to be granted explicitly. Making a document > viewable without authentication is no longer supported. I am > considering next time I use Google Docs to prepare a meeting to use > my personal gmail account since making documents public from a > personal account is still supported. > > The procedure to get access to this document is as follows: > * Log in to an account with which a Google password has been > associated. > * Open the above link. The following text will appear: "You need > access. Ask for access, or switch to an account with access. Learn > more. [Request access]". > * Select the [Request access] button. It's a bit proprietary for an open collaboration. If it's just you and a few UFS developers using it to co-ordinate, that's perfectly fine: you can post a summary when it's decided. If you really want random community people to contribute, then it should probably be an etherpad or wiki. Etherpads are easier because lots of people publicly host them: https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite/wiki/Sites-that-run-Etherpad-Lite Wikimedia looks to be the one least likely to vanish after use. > The contents of that document so far is as follows: > * Proposed date and time of the meeting. > * Draft agenda. So far there is one item on the agenda, namely how > to implement multiqueue support in the UFS driver without triggering > lock contention between submitters. > > PS: meeting about the UFS driver was suggested by another UFS driver > contributor. I try to minimize the number of meetings on my calendar. Heh, don't we all ... James
