Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] blk-crypto-fallback: properly prefix function and struct names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 29 2021 at 12:35P -0400,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and
> structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback.  Instead, use
> "blk_crypto_fallback_".  Some places already did this, but others
> didn't.
> 
> This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to
> mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like).
> Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot".
> 
> No change in behavior.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux