On Tue, 08 May 2007 14:24:32 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > However, could we compromise and just add TRUE = true, FALSE = false to > the enum? That sounds sane. But I don't recall all the details of the discussion and perhaps I'm missing something. I think the whole bool/true/false thing is pretty dissatisfactory really. Java gets this right and C cannot and will not and we end up with people using true and false as plain old "1" and "0". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
