On 2021-06-15 15:56, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
If scsi added it into its error command list and wakes-up scsi_eh
though the command is actually completed, scsi_eh will invoke
eh_abort_handler and the symptom will be duplicated, I think
Otherwise, is there anyone who know how to guarantee the coherency?
In 5.13 kernel, it is scsi_print_command(cmd) in ufshcd_abort(), while
in
5.12 and earlier kernel, it is scsi_print_command(hba->lrb[tag].cmd).
Which kernel are you using here?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Thank you for your information. I'm seeing 5.4.
Yes, for null pointer, you're right.
Then, what do you think?
In the situation I told, is there still the possibility that I
suggested?
You can make the code change to that line in your project same as 5.13.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Thanks.
Kiwoong Kim
