> If scsi added it into its error command list and wakes-up scsi_eh > though the command is actually completed, scsi_eh will invoke > eh_abort_handler and the symptom will be duplicated, I think > > Otherwise, is there anyone who know how to guarantee the coherency? > In 5.13 kernel, it is scsi_print_command(cmd) in ufshcd_abort(), while in > 5.12 and earlier kernel, it is scsi_print_command(hba->lrb[tag].cmd). > Which kernel are you using here? > > Thanks, > Can Guo. Thank you for your information. I'm seeing 5.4. Yes, for null pointer, you're right. Then, what do you think? In the situation I told, is there still the possibility that I suggested? Thanks. Kiwoong Kim
