Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] iser: Use scsi_get_sector() instead of scsi_get_lba()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/05/14 7:38, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Use scsi_get_sector() instead of scsi_get_lba() since the name of the
> latter is confusing. This patch does not change any functionality.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
> index 136f6c4492e0..d6bbf1bf428c 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
> @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ u8 iser_check_task_pi_status(struct iscsi_iser_task *iser_task,
>  			sector_t sector_off = mr_status.sig_err.sig_err_offset;
>  
>  			sector_div(sector_off, sector_size + 8);
> -			*sector = scsi_get_lba(iser_task->sc) + sector_off;
> +			*sector = scsi_get_sector(iser_task->sc) + sector_off;
>  
>  			iser_err("PI error found type %d at sector %llx "
>  			       "expected %x vs actual %x\n",
> 

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux