On 4/19/21 7:27 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > And it is non-bisectable (I guess) and could only be made bisectable > (without some ugly unions) by rolling it up into one patch. But having > separate patches definitely makes it easier for me to look at the > sg and scsi_debug driver changes, which look fine at first glance. > > Is there any way to mark a patchset like this non-bisectable? And > I think a separate patch that explains why this is being done (cause > the cover-sheet gets lost). Then git might think of a way not to > repeat that explanation 107 times. Hi Doug, If this would be considered useful I can integrate the text from the cover letter into the description of one of the patches in this series. This series should be fully bisectable. If not, it means that I made a mistake. Thanks, Bart.
