Re: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:49:17 +0100
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210420000845.25873-28-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 05:07:15PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> An explanation of the purpose of this patch is available in the patch
> "scsi: Introduce the scsi_status union".

That is not the correct way to write a changelog.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
  - From: Douglas Gilbert

References:
- [PATCH 000/117] Make better use of static type checking
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] zonefs: fix synchronous write to sequential zone files
Next by Date: [PATCH 091/117] smartpqi: Convert to the scsi_status union
Previous by thread: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 027/117] advansys: Convert to the scsi_status union
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux