Re: [PATCH 2/3] sd: implement START/STOP management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:

Seems, there is another way of doing a bank spin up / spin down: doing it in two passes. On the first pass START_STOP will be issued with IMMED=1 on all devices, then on the second pass START_STOP will be issued with IMMED=0. So the devices will spin up / spin down in the parallel, but synchronously, hence the needed result will be achieved


And maybe trip the PSU's overcurrent defenses?  There is a reason to default
to sequential spin-up for disks...

But on spin down there is no such problem

Of course, it can be user-selectable. But should it be the default?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux