On 01/07, Can Guo wrote: > On 2021-01-07 14:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 01/07, Can Guo wrote: > > > On 2021-01-07 05:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > This fixes a warning caused by wrong reserve tag usage in > > > > __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd. > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 7 at block/blk-core.c:630 blk_get_request+0x68/0x70 > > > > WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 157 at block/blk-mq-tag.c:82 > > > > blk_mq_get_tag+0x438/0x46c > > > > > > > > And, in ufshcd_err_handler(), we can avoid to send tm_cmd before > > > > aborting > > > > outstanding commands by waiting a bit for IO completion like this. > > > > > > > > __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd: task management cmd 0x80 timed-out > > > > > > > > > > Would you mind add a Fixes tag? > > > > Ok. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > > index 1678cec08b51..47fc8da3cbf9 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ > > > > /* Query request timeout */ > > > > #define QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT 1500 /* 1.5 seconds */ > > > > > > > > +/* LINERESET TIME OUT */ > > > > +#define LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS (30000) /* 30 sec */ > > > > + > > > > /* Task management command timeout */ > > > > #define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */ > > > > > > > > @@ -5899,6 +5902,8 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct > > > > *work) > > > > * check if power mode restore is needed. > > > > */ > > > > if (hba->saved_uic_err & UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR) { > > > > + ktime_t start = ktime_get(); > > > > + > > > > hba->saved_uic_err &= ~UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR; > > > > if (!hba->saved_uic_err) > > > > hba->saved_err &= ~UIC_ERROR; > > > > @@ -5906,6 +5911,20 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct > > > > *work) > > > > if (ufshcd_is_pwr_mode_restore_needed(hba)) > > > > needs_restore = true; > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > > > + /* Wait for IO completion to avoid aborting IOs */ > > > > + while (hba->outstanding_reqs) { > > > > + ufshcd_complete_requests(hba); > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > > > + schedule(); > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > > > > + if (ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) > > > > > + LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS) { > > > > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: timeout, outstanding=0x%lx\n", > > > > + __func__, hba->outstanding_reqs); > > > > + break; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > if (!hba->saved_err && !needs_restore) > > > > goto skip_err_handling; > > > > } > > > > @@ -6302,9 +6321,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void > > > > *__hba) > > > > intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS); > > > > } > > > > > > > > - if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE) { > > > > - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x\n", > > > > - __func__, intr_status); > > > > + if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE && > > > > + !ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) { > > > > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x (0x%08x, > > > > 0x%08x)\n", > > > > + __func__, > > > > + intr_status, > > > > + hba->ufs_stats.last_intr_status, > > > > + enabled_intr_status); > > > > ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, 0, UFSHCI_REG_SPACE_SIZE, "host_regs: "); > > > > } > > > > > > > > @@ -6348,7 +6371,11 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba > > > > *hba, > > > > * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely, > > > > * the maximum wait time is bounded by %TM_CMD_TIMEOUT. > > > > */ > > > > - req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED); > > > > + req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED | > > > > + BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT); > > > > > > Sorry that I didn't pay much attention to this part of code before. > > > May I know why must we use the BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag? > > > > What I understood is the reserved tag is used when aborting outstanding > > IOs when all the 32 tags were used. > > > > No, the tm requests and I/O requests are on two different tag sets: > tm requests come from hba->tmf_tag_set, while I/O requests come from > hba->shost->tag_set. Meaning they don't share tags with each other. I see. :) > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Can Guo. > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(req)) > > > > + return PTR_ERR(req); > > > > + > > > > req->end_io_data = &wait; > > > > free_slot = req->tag; > > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(free_slot < 0 || free_slot >= hba->nutmrs); > > > > @@ -9355,6 +9382,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void > > > > __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) > > > > > > > > hba->tmf_tag_set = (struct blk_mq_tag_set) { > > > > .nr_hw_queues = 1, > > > > + .reserved_tags = 1, > > > > > > If we give reserved_tags as 1 and always ask for a tm requst with > > > BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag set, then the tag shall only be allocated > > > from the reserved sbitmap_queue, whose depth is set to 1 here. > > > UFS supports tm queue depth as 8, but here is allowing only one tm > > > req at a time. Why? Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. > > > > I couldn't find tm can be issued in parallel, so thought it was issued > > one at a time. If we set 8, then we can use 24 for IOs, IIUC. > > > > Please correct me as well. I'm still trying to understand the flow. > > > > UFS allows a queue depth as 8, which means it support sending multiple > tm requests at the same time. You can check commit 69a6c269c097d780a2 - > before this change, we used to use below func to allocate tags for > tm reqs, which can tell you the true story. > > So I am thinking why don't we just we remove the BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED flag? > Removing it can also fix the warning I suppose. What do you think? Yeah, I believe it won't give a warning. Okay, let me check it out. > > -static bool ufshcd_get_tm_free_slot(struct ufs_hba *hba, int *free_slot) > -{ > - int tag; > - bool ret = false; > - > - if (!free_slot) > - goto out; > - > - do { > - tag = find_first_zero_bit(&hba->tm_slots_in_use, > hba->nutmrs); > - if (tag >= hba->nutmrs) > - goto out; > - } while (test_and_set_bit_lock(tag, &hba->tm_slots_in_use)); > - > - *free_slot = tag; > - ret = true; > -out: > - return ret; > -} > > Thanks, > Can Guo. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Can Guo. > > > > > > > .queue_depth = hba->nutmrs, > > > > .ops = &ufshcd_tmf_ops, > > > > .flags = BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED,