Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Several changes for the UPIU trace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 23:18 +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 23:37 +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> > > And another log generated sometime during 2021 after your change
> > > is
> > > merged:
> > > "send" <request upiu>
> > > "complete" < ****response upiu ****>
> > > 
> > > The current parser won't be able to differentiate between those
> > > logs.
> > > Just change the prefix strings to be "send_req" and
> > > "complete_rsp",
> > > or something,
> > > so the parsing tools that support the new format will be able to
> > > differentiate it from the old one.
> > 
> > Avri,
> > I still don't understand, this change doesn't break you current
> > parser.
> > if you still trace "send", "complete", "CDB", "query_send/complte",
> > they are still there, doesn't change. I suggest you just run on
> > your
> > system. see if there is conflict.
> > 
> > Regarding your suggestion:
> > This is not problem now, we just change this definition.
> > 
> > do you mean just "send" and "complete" or all?
> > 
> > #define
> > UFS_CMD_TRACE_STRINGS                                  
> > \              
> >           
> >         EM(UFS_CMD_SEND,        "send_req")                        
> > \  
> >                                   
> >         EM(UFS_CMD_COMP,        "complete_rsp")                    
> > \  
> > 
> > below also need add "req" and "rsp"?
> > 
> >                                   
> >         EM(UFS_DEV_COMP,        "dev_complete_rsp")                
> > \  
> >                                   
> >         EM(UFS_QUERY_SEND,      "query_send")                  
> > \      
> >                               
> >         EM(UFS_QUERY_COMP,      "query_complete")              
> > \      
> >                               
> >         EM(UFS_QUERY_ERR,       "query_complete_err")          
> > \      
> >                               
> >         EM(UFS_TM_SEND,         "tm_send")                     
> > \      
> >                               
> >         EM(UFS_TM_COMP,         "tm_complete")                 
> > \      
> >                               
> >         EM(UFS_TM_ERR,          "tm_complete_err") 
> 
> 
> Hi Avri
> 
> I am waiting for your answer. How can I change these strings to back-
> compatible with your tool? Tt seems only you use these strings.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bean
> 


Hi Avri
Before sending next version, double confirm with your.  I think you
just need change:

"send" to "send_req" 
"complete" to "complete_rsp"
                           

Bean








[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux