RE: [PATCH 05/15] qla2xxx: Don't check for fw_started while posting nvme command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,
Comments inline..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 2:32 PM
> To: Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GR-QLogic-
> Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] qla2xxx: Don't check for fw_started while posting
> nvme command
> 
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:27:20AM -0800, Nilesh Javali wrote:
> > From: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > NVMe commands can come only after successful addition of rport and nvme
> > connect, and rport is only registered after FW started bit is set. Remove the
> > redundant check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c | 12 ++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> > index b7a1dc24db38..d4159d5a4ffd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> > @@ -554,19 +554,15 @@ static int qla_nvme_post_cmd(struct
> nvme_fc_local_port *lport,
> >
> >  	fcport = qla_rport->fcport;
> >
> > -	if (!qpair || !fcport)
> > -		return -ENODEV;
> > -
> > -	if (!qpair->fw_started || fcport->deleted)
> > +	if (unlikely(!qpair || !fcport || fcport->deleted))
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> 
> This reverts the fix from patch #1 in this series. What's the reasoning
> that needs to return EBUSY when !qpair || !fcport is true?
<SK> Ideally driver should not hit (!qpair || !fcport) case.  The patch was to remove fw_started flag and consolidate other checks.
We want IO to retry until remote port is deleted and below condition is hit.
----------<condition>--------
        if (!(fcport->nvme_flag & NVME_FLAG_REGISTERED))
                return rval;
----------<condition>---------

Thanks,
~Saurav





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux