Re: [PATCH 05/15] qla2xxx: Don't check for fw_started while posting nvme command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:27:20AM -0800, Nilesh Javali wrote:
> From: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> NVMe commands can come only after successful addition of rport and nvme
> connect, and rport is only registered after FW started bit is set. Remove the
> redundant check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nilesh Javali <njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> index b7a1dc24db38..d4159d5a4ffd 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c
> @@ -554,19 +554,15 @@ static int qla_nvme_post_cmd(struct nvme_fc_local_port *lport,
>  
>  	fcport = qla_rport->fcport;
>  
> -	if (!qpair || !fcport)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	if (!qpair->fw_started || fcport->deleted)
> +	if (unlikely(!qpair || !fcport || fcport->deleted))
>  		return -EBUSY;

This reverts the fix from patch #1 in this series. What's the reasoning
that needs to return EBUSY when !qpair || !fcport is true?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux