Hi Avri, > > > > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 10:12 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > we didn't see you Acked-by in the pathwork, would you like to add > > > > them? > > > > Just for reminding us that you have agreed to mainline this series > > > > patchset. > > > > > > I acked it - https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0669baeb-5ba5764e-066831a4-0cc47a30d446-27c87d7023437946&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144660.html > > > And asked Martin to move forward - > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5035541-a8cf99e4-f502de0e-0cc47a30d446-b2b42329eddc02dc&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144738.html > > > Which he did, and got some sparse errors: > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=242040ce-79ec8c6b-2421cb81-0cc47a30d446-4d1c0f96a36b8f4d&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144977.html > > > Which I asked Daejun to fix - > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=44587fa8-1994b30d-4459f4e7-0cc47a30d446-d01ce202f9a3c6b5&q=1&e=cf195d42-fec6-43bb-b797-203c71fd6665&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Flinux-scsi%2Fmsg144987.html > > > > > > For the next chain of events I guess you can follow by yourself. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Avri > > > > Avri > > Sorry for making you confusing. yes, I knew that, and following. > > I mean Acked-by tag in the patchset, then we see your acked in the > > patchwork, and let others know that you acked it, rather than going > > backtrack history email. > > > > Hi Daejun > > I think you can add Avri's Acked-by tag in your patchset, just for > > quickly moving forward and reminding. > Ahhh - One moment please - > While rebasing the v8 on my platform, I noticed some substantial changes since v6. > e.g. the hpb lun ref counting isn't there anymore, as well as some more stuff. > While those changes might be only for the best, I think any tested-by tag should be re-assign. In this version, the HPB is no more loadable module, it is sticked with UFS-core driver. So, I removed reference counter for HPB. > Anyway, as for myself, I am not planning to put any more time in this, > until there is a clear decision where this series is going to. > > Martin - Are you considering to merge the HPB feature eventually to mainline kernel? > > Thanks, > Avri > > > > thanks, > > Bean > > Thanks, Daejun
