> > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 10:12 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > we didn't see you Acked-by in the pathwork, would you like to add > > > them? > > > Just for reminding us that you have agreed to mainline this series > > > patchset. > > > > I acked it - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144660.html > > And asked Martin to move forward - > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144738.html > > Which he did, and got some sparse errors: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144977.html > > Which I asked Daejun to fix - > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg144987.html > > > > For the next chain of events I guess you can follow by yourself. > > > > Thanks, > > Avri > > Avri > Sorry for making you confusing. yes, I knew that, and following. > I mean Acked-by tag in the patchset, then we see your acked in the > patchwork, and let others know that you acked it, rather than going > backtrack history email. > > Hi Daejun > I think you can add Avri's Acked-by tag in your patchset, just for > quickly moving forward and reminding. Ahhh - One moment please - While rebasing the v8 on my platform, I noticed some substantial changes since v6. e.g. the hpb lun ref counting isn't there anymore, as well as some more stuff. While those changes might be only for the best, I think any tested-by tag should be re-assign. Anyway, as for myself, I am not planning to put any more time in this, until there is a clear decision where this series is going to. Martin - Are you considering to merge the HPB feature eventually to mainline kernel? Thanks, Avri > > thanks, > Bean
