Re: [PATCH 09/10] block: scsi: sd: use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 11:25 +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/07/21 19:55, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size instead of hardcoded list
> 
> s/hardcoded list/hardcoded checks./
Done, thanks!

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > index d90fefffe31b7..f012e7397b058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > @@ -2520,10 +2520,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
> > unsigned char *buffer)
> >  			  "assuming 512.\n");
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (sector_size != 512 &&
> > -	    sector_size != 1024 &&
> > -	    sector_size != 2048 &&
> > -	    sector_size != 4096) {
> > +	if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(sector_size)) {
> >  		sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Unsupported sector size
> > %d.\n",
> >  			  sector_size);
> >  		/*
> > 
> 
> With the commit message fixed, looks OK.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux