Re: [PATCH 09/10] block: scsi: sd: use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/07/21 19:55, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size instead of hardcoded list

s/hardcoded list/hardcoded checks./

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index d90fefffe31b7..f012e7397b058 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2520,10 +2520,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
>  			  "assuming 512.\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	if (sector_size != 512 &&
> -	    sector_size != 1024 &&
> -	    sector_size != 2048 &&
> -	    sector_size != 4096) {
> +	if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(sector_size)) {
>  		sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Unsupported sector size %d.\n",
>  			  sector_size);
>  		/*
> 

With the commit message fixed, looks OK.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux