Hi Bean > > Hi Bart, > > > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > > yet. I > > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from > > > one or > > > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch > > > series. > > > > > > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed > > > reply. > > > > Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy. > > > > Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed- > > by tag? > > > > Thanks, > > Daejun > > Hi Daejun > > > I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it > works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance > downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should > think about HPB 2.0. I plan to add your direct submission approach with HPB 2.0. > Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined, > performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it > later. > > BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are > conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my > tested-by tag. > OK, I will. Thanks! > Tested-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Thanks, > Bean > Thanks, Daejun
