On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:27 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > Hi Bart, > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > yet. I > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from > > one or > > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch > > series. > > > > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed > > reply. > > Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy. > > Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed- > by tag? > > Thanks, > Daejun Hi Daejun I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should think about HPB 2.0. Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined, performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it later. BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my tested-by tag. Tested-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Bean
