RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] Inline Encryption support for UFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > A quick question and a comment:
> > >
> > > Does the IE infrastructure that you've added to the block layer invented
> > for ufs?
> > > Do you see other devices using it in the future?
> > >
> > > Today, chipset vendors are using a different scheme for their IE.
> > > Need their ack before reviewing your patches.
> > >
> > Yes, as of today at least in Samsung HCI, we use additional HW blocks to
> > handle all the crypto part.
> > (Though I need to check the status on the recent SoCs).
> > However given the fact that UFSHCI 2.1 spec does includes Crypto support,
> > and going by threads that you shared, looks  like other
> > Vendors does uses IE. I am inclined toward getting this reviewed.
> 
> Note that Boojin Kim, who has been Cc'ed on all these patches, has already
> been
> working on replacing Samsung's legacy inline encryption implementation with
> one
> using the new framework.
> 
> Unfortunately, Samsung's UFS inline encryption hardware doesn't follow the
> UFS
> specification, so it needs custom driver code and doesn't take much
> advantage of
> ufshcd-crypto (this patchset).  However, it can still use the blk-crypto
> framework.  So only the driver needs to differ, not the rest of the storage
> stack.  This differs from the "old world" where every vendor had to customize
> the entire storage stack to support their inline encryption hardware.
> 
> Anyway, ufshcd-crypto (this patchset) is still needed for all vendors who did
> mostly/fully follow the UFS specification, e.g. Mediatek
> (https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200304022101.14165-1-
> stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> and Qualcomm
> (https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200621173713.132879-1-
> ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx).
> 
> More reviews are always appreciated, though note that this patchset has
> already
> been out for review for over a year.  (This is really v15; Satya started the
> numbering over after blk-crypto was merged in v5.8-rc1.)  So I'm not sure we
> should count on many more formal reviews.
Ok then.
This works as a practical ack by most of the large chipset vendors.

Thanks,
Avri




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux