[PATCH] libata: initialize qc->dma_dir to DMA_NONE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



libata didn't used to init qc->dma_dir to any specific value on qc
initialization and command translation path didn't set qc->dma_dir if
the command doesn't need data transfer.  This made non-data commands
to have random qc->dma_dir.

This usually doesn't cause problem because LLDs usually check
qc->protocol first and look at qc->dma_dir iff the command needs data
transfer but this doesn't hold for all LLDs.

It might be worthwhile to rename qc->dma_dir to qc->data_dir as we use
the field to tag data direction for both PIO and DMA protocols.

This problem has been spotted by James Bottomley.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 7cfc18f..925ad7f 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -1139,6 +1139,7 @@ static inline void ata_tf_init(struct ata_device *dev, struct ata_taskfile *tf)
 
 static inline void ata_qc_reinit(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 {
+	qc->dma_dir = DMA_NONE;
 	qc->__sg = NULL;
 	qc->flags = 0;
 	qc->cursect = qc->cursg = qc->cursg_ofs = 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux