Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] qla2xxx: Fix endianness annotations in header files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/27/20 7:25 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:


This looks okay, but i would strongly suggest driver maintainer to
verify if this introduces any regression or not.

If the changes don't affect code generation, regression is impossible.

So, compilers (and cross-compilers) could answer your question, if they
could achieve sufficient code coverage.

Agree if the code generation does not change then there should be no regression.


It would be nice if there was a tag that could be added to a patch so that
CI services could check for compiler output invariance (.s or .i or both).

This sounds like a good idea for CI service to check for compiler output and make sure patch does not break it.


Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
Himanshu Madhani
Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux