Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] qla2xxx: Fix endianness annotations in header files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> This looks okay, but i would strongly suggest driver maintainer to 
> verify if this introduces any regression or not.

If the changes don't affect code generation, regression is impossible. 

So, compilers (and cross-compilers) could answer your question, if they 
could achieve sufficient code coverage.

It would be nice if there was a tag that could be added to a patch so that 
CI services could check for compiler output invariance (.s or .i or both).

> 
> Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux