Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] scsi: ufs-qcom: add Inline Crypto Engine support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:05:41PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Of course, if someone actually posts patches to support hardware that diverges
> from the UFS standard in new and "exciting" ways (whether it's another vendor's
> hardware or future Qualcomm hardware) then they'll need to post any variant
> operation(s) they need.  They need to be targetted to only the specific quirk(s)
> needed, so that drivers don't have to unnecessarily re-implement stuff.

I think the only sane answer is that we only support hardware upstream
that conforms to the standard and we skip all that bullshit.  The whole
point of the standard is that things just work, and we should not give
vendors a wild card to come up with bullshit like the interfaces handled
in this patchset.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux