Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: provide a new module parameter to set whether SCSI disks support WRITE_SAME_16 by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/1/20 3:36, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-01-19 06:13, AlexChen wrote:
>> When the SCSI device is initialized, check whether it supports
>> WRITE_SAME_16 or WRITE_SAME_10 in the sd_read_write_same(). If
>> the back-end storage device does not support queries, it will not set
>> sdkp->ws16 as 1.
>>
>> When the WRITE_SAME io is issued through the blkdev_issue_write_same(),
>> the WRITE_SAME type is set to WRITE_SAME_10 by default in the
>> sd_setup_write_same_cmnd() since of "sdkp->ws16=0". If the storage device
>> does not support WRITE_SAME_10, then the SCSI device is set to not support
>> WRITE_SAME.
>>
>> Currently, some storage devices do not provide queries for
>> WRITE_SAME_16/WRITE_SAME_10 support, but they do support WRITE_SAME_16 and
>> do not support WRITE_SAME_10. So in order for these devices to use
>> WRITE_SAME, we need a new module parameter to set whether SCSI disks
>> support WRITE_SAME_16 by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AlexChen <alex.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> index 4f7e7b607..ff368701d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_SCSI_DEVICE(TYPE_ZBC);
>>  #define SD_MINORS	0
>>  #endif
>>
>> +static int sd_default_support_ws16;
>> +module_param(sd_default_support_ws16, int, 0644);
>> +
>>  static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *, unsigned int);
>>  static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *);
>>  static int  sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
>> @@ -3014,7 +3017,8 @@ static void sd_read_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
>>  			sdev->no_write_same = 1;
>>  	}
>>
>> -	if (scsi_report_opcode(sdev, buffer, SD_BUF_SIZE, WRITE_SAME_16) == 1)
>> +	if (scsi_report_opcode(sdev, buffer, SD_BUF_SIZE, WRITE_SAME_16) == 1 ||
>> +			sd_default_support_ws16)
>>  		sdkp->ws16 = 1;
>>
>>  	if (scsi_report_opcode(sdev, buffer, SD_BUF_SIZE, WRITE_SAME) == 1)
> 
> Should this be fixed using the quirk mechanism instead of introducing a
> new kernel module parameter? Kernel module parameters apply to all SCSI
> disk devices irrespective of their vendor and model. The quirk mechanism
> can be used to introduce special behavior for certain disk models and
> types. See also the output of the following grep command:
> 
> $ git grep -nH '& BLIST'
> 
> Bart.
> 
Thanks for your reply.
I will try to fix the problem by the way you suggested above.

Thanks
Alex
> 
> .
> 





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux