On 1/7/2020 11:45 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hmm. Why do you return -EFC_FAIL here, and EFC_FAIL in the two cases above? Do you differentiate between EFC_FAIL and -EFC_FAIL? If so you should probably use different #defines ...
...
'0'? Why not EFC_FAIL/EFC_SUCCESS?
...
EFC_FAIL? Cheers, Hannes
We will remove all -1, -EFC_FAIL and return only EFC_SUCCESS/EFC_FAIL. Thanks -- james