Re: [PATCH v2 04/32] elx: libefc_sli: queue create/destroy/parse routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/7/2020 11:45 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hmm. Why do you return -EFC_FAIL here, and EFC_FAIL in the two cases above?
Do you differentiate between EFC_FAIL and -EFC_FAIL?
If so you should probably use different #defines ...

...

'0'? Why not EFC_FAIL/EFC_SUCCESS?

...
EFC_FAIL?

Cheers,

Hannes


We will remove all -1, -EFC_FAIL and return only EFC_SUCCESS/EFC_FAIL.

Thanks

-- james



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux