Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Can,

On 17-12-19, 08:37, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2019-12-17 03:12, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:05 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Can,
> > > 
> > > On 14-11-19, 22:09, Can Guo wrote:
> > > > Add reset control for host controller so that host controller can be reset
> > > > as required in its power up sequence.
> > > 
> > > I am seeing a regression on UFS on SM8150-mtp with this patch. I think
> > > Jeff is seeing same one lenove laptop on 8998.
> > 
> > Confirmed.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 845 does not seem to have this issue and only thing I can see is
> > > that on
> > > sm8150 and 8998 we define reset as:
> > > 
> > >                         resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_BCR>;
> > >                         reset-names = "rst";
> > > 
> 
> Hi Jeffrey and Vinod,
> 
> Thanks for reporting this. May I know what kind of regression do you see on
> 8150 and 8998?
> BTW, do you have reset control for UFS PHY in your DT?
> See 71278b058a9f8752e51030e363b7a7306938f64e.
> 
> FYI, we use reset control on all of our platforms and it is
> a must during our power up sequence.

Yes we do have this and additionally both the DTS describe a 'rst' reset
and this patch tries to use this.

Can you please tell me which platform this was tested on how the reset
was described in DT

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux