On Sep 16, 4:14pm, Himanshu Madhani wrote: } Subject: Re: [EXT] SRR response handling. > Hello Dr Greg, Good morning Himanshu, I hope your week has gone well. >> We are looking forward to your reflections on the expected behavior of >> the initiators if a target doesn't process the SRR. > Still waiting on internal update before I respond with more > details. Thanks for the patience. Very good, I was just going to send you a note so your timing on this was good. We are still holding geographically dispersed mirrors open until we can get a better understanding of what to expect from this situation. We are also intrigued, from a technical perspective, since we may be one of the few sites that can actually generate this phenomenon. > - Himanshu Thanks for taking the time out of your schedule to update us, we will stand by for further information from your teams. Best wishes for a pleasant weekend. Dr. Greg }-- End of excerpt from Himanshu Madhani As always, Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D. Enjellic Systems Development, LLC. 4206 N. 19th Ave. Specializing in information infra-structure Fargo, ND 58102 development. PH: 701-281-1686 EMAIL: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "For future reference - don't anybody else try to send patches as vi scripts, please. Yes, it's manly, but let's face it, so is bungee-jumping with the cord tied to your testicles." -- Linus Torvalds linux-kernel